Replace the word: "Conspiracy" with the word: "Crime" and everything makes much more sense!
Especially organized crimes that are beyond Left & Right!
Replace the word: "Conspiracy" with the word: "Crime" and everything makes much more sense! ... Especially organized crimes that are beyond Left & Right!
The good thing is that (almost) NOBODY laughs at the notion that organized crime exists!
Denying that makes you drop at least 50 points of your IQ and dropping even further if you do not see the logic that "organizing" is actually the essential part that makes it very clear what all official Law Dictionaries have to say about the word: "conspiracy".
Does that make all lawmakers "conspiracy nuts" OF COURSE NOT!
They coined the phrase: "conspiracy theorists" as: "default liars" meanwhile every crime investigator like Peter Falk "Inspector Columbo" & all kinds of police work mostly need to create some theories to work on.
* Without it, they would be out of a job! Without it, TV crime series like "COLUMBO" would be super boring.
But somehow mass media frame it as: "lunacy", "crazy", "unfounded", "unhinged", "dangerous" even if you can back up your claims with facts that often weeks or months later are "widely known & obvious" thus you are VINDICATED, they always refuse to give an apology because their job is NOT about reporting real facts unless it suits them for a particular dystopian narrative they push.
Having a conspiracy theory is not that different from having a crime theory ... so who exactly benefits if certain crime theories are not further investigated and systematically downplayed & marginalized? ... Tell me please?
* If a conspiracy is (partly) in the open does NOT make it any less criminal nor less harmful.
For believers proof is not necessary ... for non-believers proof is never good enough or "impossible" ... both believers & non-believers suk! ... Because they want everything to be spoon-fed to them! ... It takes more effort to go beyond the conditioning (for or against).
I avoid the use of the word: "believe" for a good reason ... I rather consider ... or I know ... or I am aware ... or I have experienced ... etc. etc. ... (belief-systems often begs to be corrected) ... the moment someone asks you: "Do you beLIEve?" it is a MIND TRAP to lure you in to assuming that there is "nothing" to know "nothing" to experience.
Am not seeking agreement ... nor the opposite ... as long as I stay in my own integrity and self-honesty ... we all have to deal with (partial altered) perceptions ... with many assumptions that are based upon what has been spoon-fed to all of us in a certain way ... Letting go of the "need for agreement" is very liberating and still respecting other points of view! ... Nobody has "all the right answers" and nobody has all the "wrong answers" either. There are a lot of people who want to control the narrative fanatically (left & right). This extreme need to force one-sided thinking is often a sign of severe insecurity.
Real Honest Conspiracy Researchers Studies Proven Conspiracy Facts and sometimes have "Theories" about known liars mixed with hard evidence of corruption, colluding, deceptions etc.
To label someone "Conspiracy Theorists" is to falsely assume that someone "only" cooks up "theories". This need to control the narrative by MSM is part of mass dumbing-down of a nation!
Look up the word "Conspiracy" in any Law Dictionary ... then ask yourself, is that "science fiction"? ... When 2 or more people prepare to commit a crime or to do harm, is that so "farfetched"? ... What MSM tries to do is you to be associated with certain people that are FAR from being a true researcher or being an honest conspiracy analyst. The reason MSM never can share an honest representation of that what they attack is because they assume most will not verify their own sold claims & judgmental assumptions to them! So they count on you being lazy!
--o-O-o--
[pseudo skeptic quote]: John you are a "Conspiracy Nut" [unquote]
~my default response:
Yeah, it “must” be total nuts that we have laws to put people in prison (jail) for conspiring … totally nuts is that … what were they thinking? … When two or more people prepare to commit a crime or to do harm is totally “science fiction” … the lawmakers must also be “conspiracy nuts” then.
Conspiracy Researchers studies Proven Conspiracy Facts and sometimes have “Theories” about KNOWN liars mixed with hard evidence of corruption, colluding, deceptions etc. … To label someone “Conspiracy Theorists” is to FALSELY ASSUME that someone ‘only’ cooks up “theories”.
This desperate need to control the narrative by MSM is part of mass dumbing-down of a nation! Look up the word “Conspiracy” in any (LAW) Dictionary … then ask yourself is that “science fiction”? … When 2 or more people prepare to commit a crime or to do harm, is that so “farfetched” … what MSM tries to do is you to be associated with certain people that are FAR from being a true researcher or being an honest conspiracy analyst.
The reason MSM never can share an honest representation of that what they attack is because they assume most will not verify their own sold claims & judgmental assumptions to them! So they count on you being lazy!
Ask any police officer if they are allowed to have a theory when they're investigating a possible crime … just ask them, please … Then you will realize how stupid the framing really is.
TV Series like: “Inspector Columbo” (Peter Falk) would be pretty boring if he was not allowed to have several theories when he is investigating a possible crime(s) and/or criminal suspect(s). You see they demonize any critical thinking exposing Government Puppet Politicians, Corrupted Mainstream Media, Hijacked “Protecting Agencies”, Big Pharma Mafia, Banksters with their Giant Fiat Money Pyramid Ponzi Schemes etc.
There is nothing wrong having theories ... but it will get wrong (really bad) when MSM get never get a "fact check" when they spew theories & (rigged) "computer models" / 'predicting the future' scare monger tactics 24/7 ... When we occasionally do it, they falsely assume it is meant as "absolute" or "only one way of thinking" like as if it is a fact.
So they first FRAME us (using straw-man argument tactics) then claim we are "spreading misleading/deceptive" information that can have consequences for their Agenda2030 "Global Governance" plans ... But when they (msm) have theories, it will be treated as such by "fact-checkers sites" leaving them alone as the theories HELPS to push their agenda when they are NOT openly challenged!
Meanwhile, they are the ones using obvious misleading/deceptive framing techniques to silence any form of real opposition/resistance.
cheers,
John Kuhles
--o-O-o--
--o-O-o--
My response to:
PaulGr quote: "Those who actually bothered to do their homework knew this about the jabs at the beginning. Glad that this is finally making some headlines. The next step is to report on the NEGATIVE efficacy after a few months! Not conspiracy - just what the actual data has shown for well over a year.... and prior to the vaccine mandates. I wonder when people at large will be ready to discuss openly the actual harms?"
* source quote here (see comments)
Me: I noticed that a lot of so-called "neutral people" who are critical and healthy skeptical distance themselves of having any form of conspiracy analyses as it is assumed it is the same as "conspiracy theories" ... then using in my view, really pathetic statement-phrases like:
01. "it is not a conspiracy ... it is a fact"
02. "it is not a conspiracy ... they just showing it all in the open"
03. "it is not a conspiracy ... when they themselves tell us how they gonna do it"
04. "it is not a conspiracy ... because it is mainstream knowledge now"
05. "it is not a conspiracy ... because new evidence can be analysed by all of us now"
Having a "conspiracy theory" is not that different having a "crime theory" ... so who exactly benefits that certain crime theories are not further investigated (analysed) and systematically downplayed & marginalized?
Replace the word "conspiracy" with the word "crime" (which that is what a conspiracy really is when 2 or more people prepare to commit a crime or to do harm).
Then all of a sudden you see (in my view) how weird some people can be:
01. "it is not a crime ... it is a fact" (assuming “crime” aka “organzied crime” aka “conspiracy” can never be factual?)
02. "it is not a crime ... they just showing it all in the open" (same dumbness)
03. "it is not a crime ... when they themselves tell us how they gonna do it" (same silliness)
04. "it is not a crime ... because it is mainstream knowledge now" (same)
05. "it is not a crime ... because new evidence can be analyzed by all of us now" (same)
That is why am totally fed up with people thinking they are so "neutral" and "skeptical" still defending (helping covering up) crimes by demonizing others who are genuine conspiracy researchers being way ahead of the curve and exposing all sorts of crimes that have been (at first) willfully ignored, cast aside, censored, marginalized, ridiculed, buried, shadow-banned, de-listed >>> all because they assumed they are "just conspiracy theories".
This framing is done systematically for decades! And the vindication process normally took over 10 years, but nowadays key-people from withing (whistleblowers) exposing stuff is growing exponentially.
Today's "conspiracy theories" are (mostly) just a forecast of what will be acknowledged within 6 months later on ... and when that happens some still use the stupid phrase: "it is not a conspiracy ... it is a fact" >>> utterly CRINGE TIME! ... as if "there can never be conspiracies" ... meanwhile we have Law Dictionaries explaining exactly what a conspiracy is.
The taboo is so big that people dismiss high treason & high crimes against humanity by default >>> because they are so afraid to be called: "conspiracy theorists" even if it is just a label to misrepresent & frame genuine honest conspiracy (aka crime) analysts & researchers.
One detective, one crime investigator is at least 1000 times more powerful if you have "crowdsourcing" available to you ... but there is a catch: if you make mistakes, it can heavily backfire ... that is why you have to be very careful about what you claim and how you "counter frame" things! >>> Knowing how to use the right (lawful) language to expand (y)our quest for the truth and expand (y)our awareness that is beyond any "tunnel vision" narrative.
For the record: ... I do not really need to change (replace) the word "to make much more sense", but it seems a lot of (willful) ignorants & deniers do!
cheers,
JohnKuhles aka 'ExomatrixTV'