I type all of this below from the top of my head (not looking elsewhere) default questions about the mRNA injections posing as "covid vaccines" pushed on a massive scale:
01. Is it experimental? (I know it sounds like a silly: "kicking an open door" question, but there are still people out there that have no clue).
03. Who exactly is made responsible for the oversight that they apply/follow the code of medical ethics? (if any).
04. What kind of "safety testing" has been done with clinical trials AND double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (if any) and did they bypass normal safety testing using (made up/faulty) "Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)"? … Where can we verify/check their claims of alleged "safety testing" of any kind?
05. Would they still call it "vaccines" before they changed the definition of what a "vaccine suppose to be"? How many people know that they changed it before the mass covid hysteria started in 2020?
06. Are all ingredients/adjuvants/preservatives/catalysts/boosters of the injections made public? ... If not, why not?
07. When the truth eventually comes out about question 06. ... Who will be held accountable/liable for unethical procedures on an unprecedented, massive scale? ... Who will be the front "fall guy" to be sacrificed, meanwhile the real criminals are still made "untouchable" with great help from corrupt media & corrupt politicians.
08. How many "vaccine" claims made by Big Pharma, Mass Media & Politicians turned out to be PROVABLE FALSE, meanwhile demonizing/punishing/censoring anyone who knew this in advance including top medical professionals & insiders.
09. How corrupt are the unelected top officials working for the unelected W.H.O. connected to totalitarian China & unelected psychopath Bill Gates?
10. Are FDA & CDC "captured agencies" thus lying (complicit in a cover-up) to deceive the public systematically 24/7?
11. How much more profit was made in the (experimental mRNA injections) "vaccine" industry due to the pushing/mass imposing their product in directly or indirectly using mandatory tactics? «« violating many different basic human rights!
12. The Official Government “Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System” (VAERS) and almost all variants who do similar work (including The Netherlands 🇳🇱 ) worldwide changed their practices/procedures in comparison to how they behaved in previous decades ... among others: much less transparency ... WHY IS THAT?
13. Big Pharma & "Vaccine" Industry Advertisements/Ads viaall big Mass Media is strictly forbidden in most countries except the USA,why is the obvious not discusses/exposed as devastating bad for the brainwashed (heavily conditioned) people?
14. Death Certificates system related to (alleged) "COVID Deaths" vs (real) "Vaccine Deaths" turned out to be a huge scam, recently all made public now in 2024 by the recent declassification process thanks to the F.O.I.A.requests! … But the mass media refuses to have an honest open transparent debate about this … In my view, proves they are complicit in a massive crime on a major scale.
15. Whyare the "Excess Deaths" & "Died Suddenly" happening the most in severe vaccinated countries? ... Even mainstream statistics showing increase in deaths (not decrease) but mass media is deafening silent about that, the same people who took part in scaring millions 24/7 in to "taking the vaccines" because of the alleged danger are now quiet with more deaths than what happened in 2020 ... This is mind-boggling how hypocrite most "vaccine pushes" depriving basic human rights of others because they can not handle their own MASS INDUCED anxiety issues blindly trusting the mass media hysteria ... The same responsible people who were complicit are now: "fighting dis- & misinformation" fighting anyone who are exposing their complicity in crimes against humanity!
16. Would using the "Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)" be allowed if there is a cheap alternative like Ivermectin & HCQ (Hydroxychloroquine) to prevent/cure covid related problems of all kinds? … The obvious answer is: HELL NO! ... That is why so many are complicit to demonize alternative solutions and all who refuse to challenge their false accusations.
17. 100% related to previous question 16.: What about the "Do No Harm" Oath of any Doctor/Nurse injecting experimental mRNA injections on a massive scale?
18. How many Medical Professionals, Doctors, Nurses signed The Great Barrington Declaration? … How many joined the America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS.org) ... If you do not know the answer to that question, there may be a reason why they do not want you to find out.
19. Why are there no consequences for "3rd party" Fact Checkers (like Reuters/AP who are lying/deceiving/falsely accuse) used by big social media platforms like Facebook/YouTube/Instagram etc. to systematically censor/bury/shadow-ban/silence dissent >> even professional scientists! All with help from automated A.I. algorithms/scripts to "micromanage" (condition) millions of people.
20. If it turned out to be true that the "covid injections" and most (if not all) follow-up "booster shots" contains BioSensor/NanoTech ... How long will it take before the masses waking up to this fact? ... Who is responsible to keep the masses systematically dumb about this?
21. Why is the"Event 201"andRockefeller PDF Document "Operation Lockstep" never discussed in mainstream media in 2020-2021?
22. Why is natural herd immunity willfully ignored or demonized by almost all so called (in my view, corrupt) "experts" who are allowed to push tunnel vision narratives on MSM?
"Dr. Naomi Wolf who I dearly respect for so many reasons ... but she buys the C0VID Hysteria (in 2021) thinking it is a "genuine major crisis" justifying all kinds of tyranny she predicted would happen ... She does not even question WHY they put C0VID in the "same danger" category A like Ebola is beyond me ... She may not even know that corrupted W.H.O. mainly run by Bill Gates & totalitarian China changed the definition of "Pandemic" couple years ago all part of several "emergency preparedness" exercises like "Event 201" in 2019 ... How much does she NOT know? ... Really sad that she does not know she falls for the covid lies & deceptions.
Riggedfatality rates (IFR CFR), deeply flawed PCR Tests, no evidence that face masks "really helps" nor "lockdowns" (sate Florida has NO lockdown!) nor "1,5 meter rule" helps and the scheme goes on and on and on.
Study 2 most abused/neglected words by the medical tyranny & big pharma mafia network including W.H.O. with their push for experimental untested mRNA Vaccines on millions worldwide … The two magical words are: "informed consent" as described in the Nuremberg Code of Ethics Treaty signed by all Western Countries! … See also this
Even MSM admits the blatant tyranny: "you can’t sue Pfizer nor Moderna if you have severe covid vaccine side effects. The government likely won’t compensate you for damages either"
01. Deeply flawed PCR Tests generating way too many "false positives".
02. Rigged aka Artificial Inflated IFR-CFR Fatality Rate Numbers to scare the masses 24/7 without proper context given.
03.Violating Nuremberg Codeon a massive scale and MSM is dead silent about it.
04.Liability scamcreates guaranteed huge vulture profits without risks for the big experimental mRNA vaccine makers.
05. Suppressing/Criminalizing Real Alternative Cures/Solutions.
06. Silencing (worldwide)1000s of Critical (Non-corruptible) Scientists, Virologist, Medical Specialists & Professionals etc. Mass censorship worldwide coordinated by almost all big social media platforms using corrupt "Fact Checkers Sites" (indirectly) paid by Bill Gates and/or Soros.
07. Spreading false claims/assumptions about face masks, Lockdowns, "Social Distancing" etc.
08. Using corrupt & false "Computer Models" to "predict" outcome that is the bases for never-ending Tyranny.
09. Many big celebrities are complicit in virtue signaling 24/7 for the mass conditioning / propaganda of fear ... to help raise/increase anxiety disorder on a massive scale where more and more have a tunnel vision all by design.
10. No one really wants to be held responsible when all evil is eventually exposed ... they rather shift the blame in (blindly) "trusting the authorities" doing the thinking for them, including willful puppet politicians following orders from above.
11. Mass Media failed on so many levels, it is, in my view, beyond Orwellian.
And I can go on and on ... all part of "justifying tyranny" Agenda2030 ... and I feel deeply upset that most can not see it ... or they CAN see it but do not want to "rock the boat" ... or they just do not want to see it.
The moment any power that is "entrusted to them" seek ANY excuse (made up, fabricated, exaggerated, manipulated using rigged "computer models" promoting doom-porn based upon provable faulty tunnel vision narratives etc.) All to "justify" do to more evil for "the assumed greater good" ... "their greater good".
Theywill decide how much we must sacrifice, when and where to "SOLVE" their made up crisis (plural) >>> When that predictably fails >>>theywill blame all of us for "not fully cooperating" with their (corrupt) tunnel vision narratives and double down with their Dystopian "Global Governance" Agenda2030 & NetZero2050 >>> ALL without any accountability to the real crisis effects as a result of their severe badmanagement.
* On top of all that, these psychopaths will gaslight anyone who dares to expose what they are actually doing to us.
Then, when the real major crisis (plural) kicks in because of their "new normal"** dystopian actions, "good people" within the totally corrupt system will do "good deeds" used as a "showcase" that they are part of a "good cause" totally IGNORING what preceded NOT allowed to be discussed on big social media platforms nor any big mainstream media!
And to go back, how I started my mini-rant here: power, that is "entrusted to them" does not even fly ... theperceptionof assumed trust they suppose to have earned is bogus!
So the hard truth of the matter is: Justifying their powers they have built on assumed "trust", but did not deserve to have to begin with >>> is so freaking obvious! ... But somehow "mainstream media" decided to play & act dumb about this fact, which makes them 100% complicit in crimes against humanity.
The pathetic parasite class enjoys how most of the common people falls (submit) to their Psychological Warfare Operations with big help from unelected Natocontrol freaks.
In a sane world you'd be one of the most popular writers on this platform. Then again, if the world was sane, you wouldn't have to write any of this stuff most likely :)
Ask any Medical Doctor What “The Precautionary Principle” Really Means and Why it is Important … If he stumbles or hesitates to answer that legit question, you know he is somehow compromised, thus less to be trusted!
Grok 2.0 response:
The Precautionary Principle in medicine and public health refers to taking precautionary measures when there is a potential for harm, even if some cause-and-effect relationships are not fully established scientifically. Here's a breakdown of what it entails and why it's crucial:
What is the Precautionary Principle?
Proactive Approach: Instead of waiting for definitive proof that an action or substance is harmful, the principle advocates for taking preventive action to avoid possible harm, especially when the consequences could be severe or irreversible.
Burden of Proof: It shifts the burden of proof to those who introduce new practices, substances, or technologies to demonstrate that these are safe, rather than requiring the public or regulatory bodies to prove harm.
Risk Management: This principle encourages the implementation of risk management strategies in situations of scientific uncertainty where the potential for serious or irreversible damage exists.
Why is it Important?
Public Health Protection: It's essential for protecting public health by preventing exposure to potentially harmful agents or conditions before definitive scientific data is available. Examples include the initial handling of new viruses or environmental pollutants.
Environmental Safety: Beyond medicine, it applies to environmental policies, where preventing ecological damage or species extinction due to new chemicals or technologies is critical.
Ethical Responsibility: It embodies an ethical approach to uncertainty, emphasizing the duty to prevent harm where possible. This is particularly relevant in scenarios where vulnerable populations might be disproportionately affected.
Decision Making Under Uncertainty: In medical and public health fields, where often decisions must be made with incomplete information, the precautionary principle provides a framework for making such decisions more responsibly.
Why A Doctor Might Hesitate or Be Uninformed:
Specialization: Not all doctors are trained in public health or policy, where the precautionary principle is more frequently discussed. Their primary focus might be on direct patient care rather than preventive public health strategies.
Misinterpretation: Some might confuse the precautionary principle with an overly cautious or fear-based approach, which isn't accurate. It's about informed, proactive prevention.
Controversy: The application of the precautionary principle can be contentious, especially in industries where it might lead to regulatory restrictions or in debates over innovation vs. safety.
If a doctor is unable to articulate what the precautionary principle is, it might indicate a gap in their public health education or awareness, rather than being "compromised." However, it would be a cue for you to seek further explanation or look into public health resources for a clearer understanding.
In a sane world you'd be one of the most popular writers on this platform. Then again, if the world was sane, you wouldn't have to write any of this stuff most likely :)
Ask any Medical Doctor What “The Precautionary Principle” Really Means and Why it is Important … If he stumbles or hesitates to answer that legit question, you know he is somehow compromised, thus less to be trusted!
Grok 2.0 response:
The Precautionary Principle in medicine and public health refers to taking precautionary measures when there is a potential for harm, even if some cause-and-effect relationships are not fully established scientifically. Here's a breakdown of what it entails and why it's crucial:
What is the Precautionary Principle?
Proactive Approach: Instead of waiting for definitive proof that an action or substance is harmful, the principle advocates for taking preventive action to avoid possible harm, especially when the consequences could be severe or irreversible.
Burden of Proof: It shifts the burden of proof to those who introduce new practices, substances, or technologies to demonstrate that these are safe, rather than requiring the public or regulatory bodies to prove harm.
Risk Management: This principle encourages the implementation of risk management strategies in situations of scientific uncertainty where the potential for serious or irreversible damage exists.
Why is it Important?
Public Health Protection: It's essential for protecting public health by preventing exposure to potentially harmful agents or conditions before definitive scientific data is available. Examples include the initial handling of new viruses or environmental pollutants.
Environmental Safety: Beyond medicine, it applies to environmental policies, where preventing ecological damage or species extinction due to new chemicals or technologies is critical.
Ethical Responsibility: It embodies an ethical approach to uncertainty, emphasizing the duty to prevent harm where possible. This is particularly relevant in scenarios where vulnerable populations might be disproportionately affected.
Decision Making Under Uncertainty: In medical and public health fields, where often decisions must be made with incomplete information, the precautionary principle provides a framework for making such decisions more responsibly.
Why A Doctor Might Hesitate or Be Uninformed:
Specialization: Not all doctors are trained in public health or policy, where the precautionary principle is more frequently discussed. Their primary focus might be on direct patient care rather than preventive public health strategies.
Misinterpretation: Some might confuse the precautionary principle with an overly cautious or fear-based approach, which isn't accurate. It's about informed, proactive prevention.
Controversy: The application of the precautionary principle can be contentious, especially in industries where it might lead to regulatory restrictions or in debates over innovation vs. safety.
If a doctor is unable to articulate what the precautionary principle is, it might indicate a gap in their public health education or awareness, rather than being "compromised." However, it would be a cue for you to seek further explanation or look into public health resources for a clearer understanding.